David Leader wrote:

>I have now sorted things out and established that:
>
>1. 'restrict (0)' supported in Jmol 10 has to be replaced by 'restrict none'
>I don't  mind that. I knew it was a silly hack when I couldn't get 
>things to work for some other reason and should have changed it.
>2. The edited pdb files with Hydrogens added screw up the parsing of 
>certain atoms in Jmol 11 and give them a clubfoot appearance. Why 
>Jmol 10 tolerated this I'm not sure. Anyway, one can hardly blame 
>Jmol. I've had so much grief processing Richardson 500 files. The 228 
>in my database are from 300 - 70 thrown away. I can see my having to 
>scan all 228 files by eye for this sort of format problem.
>  
>
this is fixed in the latest development version of Jmol.

>3. I think there is a bug in jmolSetCheckboxGroup().
>
>I have mounted one of my tests that illustrates this at:
><http://doolittle.ibls.gla.ac.uk/leader/jmoltest/>
>
>As regards the jmol.js bug, check All Motifs and then uncheck any of 
>the ones  below. All remains checked. Other aspects of it are ok.
>I apologize for not testing this before, as I asked for this sort of 
>thing to be incorporated.
>  
>
Hmm. Maybe.

>As regards the bad display, select single motif display and then 
>Catmat: 48,48,50 . Glu 50 is screwed up.
>
>  
>
This is the configurations issue. Check that out.

>If you want to see the Jmol10 version, go to:
><http://doolittle.ibls.gla.ac.uk/motif>
>choose Ligand Proximity and 1MFM and 3D Display to see the 
>corresponding Jmol10 version done on the fly from the database.
>
>David
>
>
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to