>On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Robert Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Excellent! Say, did you know we came close to 10,000 downloads last month? > >Oh, and ranked 62 overall on SourceForge (today)... this means Jmol >has en enormous impact! >Here's of the last few months: > >https://sourceforge.net/project/stats/?group_id=23629&ugn=jmol&type=&mode=year >
It would be interesting to identify all the STM journals that deploy it in some manner or other. I suspect it may be 100s! I also suspect there are many more molecular biological journals than chemistry journals using it. On this point, I normally cite Jmol via the web site, but one punctilious editor demanded a "publisher", location, etc in the absence of a definitive published citable article. There is no single clear citation one can use for Jmol (I ended up citing Angel's recent publication). Perhaps someone can figure out how Jmol is best cited, and then place that advice clearly on the Jmol site? -- Henry Rzepa. +44 (020) 7594 5774 (Voice); http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/rzepa.xrdf (FOAF) http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK. (Voracious anti-spam filter in operation for received email. If expected reply not received, please phone/fax). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
