On 9 Oct 2008 at 9:01, Rzepa, Henry wrote: > It would be interesting to identify all the STM journals that deploy it in > some manner or other.
Sorry, what is STM? May I remind all of you that there is a place to list any journal you may know that uses Jmol: http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/Journals_Using_Jmol > On this point, I normally cite Jmol via the web site, but one punctilious > editor demanded a "publisher", location, etc in the absence of a definitive > published citable article. There is no single clear citation one can use for > Jmol (I ended up citing Angel's recent publication). Perhaps someone can > figure out how Jmol is best cited, and then place that advice clearly on the > Jmol site? Yes, people must start changing their way of thinking. Yesterday I was reading a paper in J.Chem.Educ. where the mention of the Atomium in Brussels was accompanied by a number in the list of references, pointing to the Atomium's website! That author and editor are clearly on the new wave :-) The last discussion we held on the list arrived at recommending the website as citing, and after a warm discussion on the precise title, I ended up deciding on the current one, which should be included in addition to the url. But f course any discussion on the best citing format is welcome I am of course very happy that my paper in BaMBEd gets cited ;-) All of you may be interested to know that it is now available in full text for anyone (since it just turned 2 years old this summer, Wiley is offering it now as open) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
