Sure. That's better than geosurface. Geosurface should only be used with full molecules, not partial surfaces, as it's rather ragged on the "inside".
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Roni Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: > At 2010-06-01 09:24, you wrote: > >From: Robert Hanson <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: [Jmol-users] surface representations of atom selections > > > >Check the documentation regarding the isosurface command and the > >options SELECT and IGNORE. Some combination of those two will do > >exactly what you want. If you use SASURFACE and you want the same > >scale as geosurface or dots or spacefill, be sure to use SASURFACE 0. > > > >Some reason not to just use spacefill? Or are you already using that > >within a translucent surface? > > > >I should probably remove the geosurface-dots motion business. It's > >not a much-used shape, and I'm not sure it makes any real difference > >in rendering speed. > > > >Bob > > I didn't realize that IGNORE did more than just invert the SELECT > expression -- I'll give it a shot. And the reason I'm using the > isosurface is for the mesh effect. > > Roni > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave. Northfield, MN 55057 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr phone: 507-786-3107 If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
