Well, that's an interesting question. What I believe we found is that we were using Java 1.5 methods prior to that and just didn't know it. So we were defacto requiring 1.5, I think. The test is if a person can start 12.0 and not 12.1, but I think these two(?) reports related to both of them.
Bob 2010/8/19 Angel Herráez <[email protected]> > Shouldn't that read "starting Jmol 12.1" ? > > On 19 Aug 2010 at 8:56, Robert Hanson wrote: > > > > > Let's get a prominent note to that effect in the files download page or > somewhere in the release > > notes. Java 1.5 required. Nico, I am fully convinced this was a VERY good > idea, despite the fact > > that some users will hit this snag. > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Nicolas Vervelle <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Starting with Jmol 12.0, we decided to stop supporting Java versions > before 1.5. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users > -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave. Northfield, MN 55057 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr phone: 507-786-3107 If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
