For consistency, I propose that JSmol.lite.js should be called JSmol.lite.nojq.js while JSmol.lite.jq.js should be renamed JSmol.lite.js
The reason is that by default, both standard JSmol and lightweight JSmol need jQuery. Since the standard has "JSmol.min.nojq.js" as an exceptional alternative, if would in my opinion be more easily understood to have the same scheme in the lightweight version. Both non-jQuery options are the alternatives only for those using external jQuery files. Both should have similar file names. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
