El 3 Nov 2015 a las 15:05, Robert Hanson escribió:
> And don't forget that Jmol has a WebGL option, but I don't claim that it is 
> any better than the 
> others. It's not our forte, and it comes with a significant overhead if all 
> you want is a molecule to 
> show.

Yes, I am aware of that.
Bob, I noticed there is a JSmol.GLmol.min.js  that needs to be called in 
addition to JSmol.min.js
Is the order for calling those two important?



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users

Reply via email to