El 3 Nov 2015 a las 15:05, Robert Hanson escribió: > And don't forget that Jmol has a WebGL option, but I don't claim that it is > any better than the > others. It's not our forte, and it comes with a significant overhead if all > you want is a molecule to > show.
Yes, I am aware of that. Bob, I noticed there is a JSmol.GLmol.min.js that needs to be called in addition to JSmol.min.js Is the order for calling those two important? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users