Agreed. Signed Java can become handy in the distribution. Files not needed for a functional JSmol, like examples, scripts, etc, can be on a separated download.
Jaim > On 18 May 2016, at 12:38 PM, Angel Herráez <angel.herr...@uah.es> wrote: > > I certainly would prefer to have Java available in the distribution. For > large > proteins and complexes there is still a significant difference in performance. > > Maybe the nonsigned variant can be dropped / separated into the other > download > > On the other hand, I would vote for not having the extra files in the > distribution like examples, scripts, copy of jQuery etc > Just leave what is needed for an operative JSmol, HTML5+Java > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who > bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM > restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the > apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
