On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 07:29:37 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I’d prefer to leave it as a plain store to avoid the unnecessary extra fence. > > But it isn't then an atomic update. Only the disablers write to this counter while holding `VThreadTransition_lock` (verified in the assert above). But we still need to use `AtomicAccess` for the store because it can be concurrently read by the virtual thread. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28361#discussion_r2566654448
