The implementation of isSupported(DateTimeFieldType) checks if the duration is supported. When considering the era DateTimeField, the DuratioField is eras, but that duration is not supported. But the era DateTimeField most definitely *should* be supported.
So, if we don't add an eras DurationField, then I have to have a weird 'special case' for era DateTimeField.
Stephen
On 14/02/06, Garvelink, Barend
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like Brian, I think this is past the 90/10 point. Nice for completeness,
but of questionable benefit in the "western" chronologies. I don't know
if any of the other chronologies warrant this feature, but I for one
will not miss it if it's not there.
