Laurent wrote:-
> PLEASE see my reply to MACK in today's digest for a more detailed answer.
That does indeed clear things up. The combination of yesterday's tragic
events and some very "loose" statements really didn't sit well together
though.
I can only hope that you did notice the occurrance of "seems", "could"
and "should"...
> My timing was perhaps wrong, which I personally disclaimed from the start by
> saying this was a cheap shot. It's insensitive but do you think it's
> unrelated?
Unrelated - perhaps not, but I think we need the benefit of time and
proven intelligence before conclusions are leapt to, parallels drawn,
and so on.
Cheers,
--Chris
