Colin,
As our former President Reagan is famous for saying,
"Well, there you go again."
Now you are insisting that calling someone "childish and sacrcastic is not
name calling." Apparently you don't think that calling someone "hypocrical"
(as written) is name calling either. Bunk.
You are suggesting that Michael has engaged you in a personal attack? I
can't even BEGIN to imagine where that comes from. You've been reading
Michael's stuff for years, just like the rest of us. Arrogant? LOL. Are
you seriously accusing Michael Paz of arrogance? LOL! You've come up with
some doozies in the past so I guess this is not entirely unexpected. This
ranks right up there with "the National Enquirer is a perfectly respectable
news source" and the infamous "death wish post" of last year.
Take a moment, will ya? Will ya post out of respect and thoughtfulness
rather than out of reflex?
Can we please stick to debate?
Catching up,
Lamadoo
> Dear Micahel- re read your post and see who is thinking they are immune.
> I know you have been itching to have a go, because myself and others have
> dared to call your friend on his beahviour. If you are so concerned about
> bad beahviour, why didn't you speak up before?
>
> Name calling is not my game. Saying what you wrote is childish and
> sacrcastic is not name calling.
>
> You are being hypocrical.
>
> Of course I feel freee to write as I wish, I belong to this list
> as much as
> you do. the difftreence is, unlike you, I don't have the
> arrogance you have
> just displayed.
> If you don't like what i write, fine, I don't expect people to. i don't
> write for you.
>
> However, I aslo don't expect this sort of personal attack
> especially from sombody who pretends to be above it!
