--- Kakki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Catherine,
> 
> I was me who made the remark about Marxist teachers'
> influence in the U.S.
> Maybe today they call themselves Socialists or
> Progressives and I'm sure
> they have a different idealogical agenda than they
> did when I was in school
> in the 60s and 70s.  Back in my day they called
> themselves "Marxists" and
> were very open about proclaiming that politcal
> label.  Then again, as I just
> wrote previously, it was considered to be hip in
> some circles back then to
> call onself a Marxist because it was "radical" and
> definitely a way to show
> that one was against the "establishment." 

Sorry about that, Kakki.  I hadn't read your later
post clarifying this, so it makes a lot more sense. 
Yes, it was very chic to be radical back in the 60s
and even the 70s.  I had a few of those, but probably
none as radical as the ones you encountered - I never
met one who called him- or herself a Marxist, but in
university it may have depended on what courses you
were taking.  I was thinking more of teachers of today
(one example being my brother-in-law) and I would
think of them more as liberals or socialist-leaning,
types, but with down-home values.  Kind of ex-hippies
who've mellowed out a bit.
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca

Reply via email to