It's true what you say Bob, but it can be hard to separate the human goings
on in a movie from the intended or desired effect of that movie. It is most
certainly teh case with David Lynch.  He doesn't seem to be an analytical
sort, but rather led by his emotions and heart, and creating for the sake of
art, not just to pander to the masses and make a quick buck (that's where i
disagree with Lama).  I think it was someone on this list that said, some
time ago, if you want everything to make sense you shouldn't go to a David
Lynch movie in teh first place.
 I think Mulholland Drive is an interesting film, a point i may have failed
to make in my previoius post. I also think that David Lynch is vey creative
and important in the industry.  His is a strong presence saying that not all
movies need be formulaic, saying that not all movies need to make sense, or
need to tie up easily. I can guarantee that had i read a novel or even
screenplay of it, i would have been bowled over.  I'm just too comfortable
being spoonfed by filmmakers:)

 What you said Bob sort of reminds me of that classic experiment of popular
psychology.  You know the one, where you have differnet words printed in
different colours, but each of hte words is the name of a colour that isn't
the colour of the ink.  You ask people what colour is the word, and they
invariably stumble and give you what the word says,lol.  They say yellow, if
the word yellow is printedin blue, and the correct answer to tehe question
asked is blue.
GARRET

NP- Tori Amos, Sweet Dreams




----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Think about paintings - many of them don't make any sense per se, they may
be created as a study about interactions of color and shadow, not a portrait
or still life. Think about music; instrumentals are meant to be enjoyed for
the textures and colors of sound, not because the song is telling a story or
creating a concrete defined image...and even when there are lyrics, it may
not mean a thing (I Am The Walrus, Glass Onion, etc) but may rather be a
study about the interplay of words.

Reply via email to