Hi Bob,

> I think it's as simple as the fact that the economy is in the crapper and
> people want change, so they voted for change. I don't think it's a mandate
> for Bush or Republicans per se. Nor do I think the new regime is going to
> turn the world around or upside down as some of the others do. The vote
comes
> up again in 2004 - how much can get done in two years? Not a lot. And then
> what will happen? People will vote for change again, and there ya' go.

I think it's about more than the economy but generally agree with the rest
of what you say.  That's why I think people on the losing side shouldn't get
so worked up about it.

> I voted for some Repubs and some Dems...I tried to vote for the person and
> not the party, I don't think this generalization stuff does anybody any
good
> - like Joni says, it just creates a borderline.

I agree and have always voted in the same manner.  (But will confess that
for the first time in my life I voted a straight Repub. ticket yesterday ;-)

Kakki

Reply via email to