Sarah,

I'veenjoyed your posts and agree with most of what you have written.  I know
that the situation in Iraq  that you have articulated many times concurs
with everything I've read and heard going back to the early 90s. I know that
the assertions of atrocities and weapons capabilities are not some new
propaganda that has been suddenly manufactured as a pretext for war. Many
Iraqis who have escaped to the U.S. have been telling these stories  for
years.

However, you have mentioned a few times about the CIA being "anti-democracy"
and this assertion is a new and perplexing one for me.  I see the CIA as
merely a government agency.  I can't see that it has its own independent
agenda on foreign policy. While they may well be some rogue agents and a
competition with the other security agencies such as the FBI and NSA,  the
CIA is essentially directed by whatever administration is in power in the
White House.  Are you basing this position on the article in Vanity Fair
where the INC contends that the CIA basically abandoned them in their fight
to overcome Saddam?   Most of the anti-war demonstrations going on in the US
have been organized by openly declared Marxist organizations.  ANSWER has
been the prime mover in organizing the protests since nearly the day after
9/11.  Are you familiar with them?  If you go to their website, there are
several links to organizations such as "Communist Workers of America,"
"American Communist Party," and the like.  ANSWER tried to link more
mainstream organizations affiliated with religious groups to their movement
and there has been much controversy and objection from some of those
organizations which have been unwittingly linked to them.  There are certain
anti-war church organizations and also a faction in the Libertarian party
which is anti-war which have been trying to disassociate themselves from the
Marxist anti-war organizations.  Are you saying that the CIA has set all
this up (the ANSWER affiliated groups) as a ruse behind the scenes?  I'm
just curious as to what information you may have on this.

Kakki

Reply via email to