(Your grammar appears to be correct, but that where's any accuracy ends.)
<<(2)because it's on the east coast, it made it easier for the media to do its bit to
"throw the election" by inaccurately calling Florida for Gore thus dissuading
Republicans from voting throughout the country; and>>
It has yet to be established that Gore did not win Florida, thus the media projection
you refer to may in fact be correct...which is part of the point of the coincidence
list.
<<(3)Florida's governor is the brother to one of the candidates making it easier for
Democrats to hide their "mischief," knowing that if there are any
"voting irregularites" that most of the sheeple would naturally accuse Geo. Bush.>>
This is complete drivel, not even worthy of a reasoned response.
For your information, the voter fraud allegation is not "dropped," it is just not
being pursued by the Gore campaign itself. Why. In the interest of time, mostly. But
also because the Gore mantra has been that all votes should be counted. Even with
them, Gore still wins, in all likelyhood, if all ballots are counted.
-Julius
