[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So you tell me who wins that argument.
This is the crux of the problem in communicating with you, Marcel. You're the
only one on the list who thinks there's any winning or losing going on here.
Everyone else is involved in conversations, not death matches where information
is used as weaponry. What's the point of that? Where's any enjoyment in that?
You're the only one playing a wargame so for you to scold anyone about not
responding to your weapons is meaningless.
Especially in political discussions, most of your information comes from
right-wing propaganda websites without you recognizing or admitting to their
one-sidedness. There's no evidence from you of thinking or discovering or
questioning or willingness to genuinely consider another person's viewpoint and
thereby have an actual give and take conversation; you just repeat huge amounts
of information like a robot and when you don't automatically "win" your argument
by doing that, your next weapons are outright snideness, hatefulness and
meanspiritedness. So, once a person has had one such experience, why would
anyone bother responding to you again? Knowing your attitude, I don't even
bother reading most of what you write, and never read the unwanted private
messages I receive from you; they go right into the trash since you continue to
send them even after my requests that you respond publicly to a public post.
So you're in the war all by yourself and thinking you're winning. That's very
sad.
Debra Shea
