Re: the album form

[IVPAUL42]

In a message dated 4/23/01 5:22:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< I don't disagree that violating copyright is wrong.  (Not that it has been
 proven that that is what Napster has done.  Or Napster users for that
 matter.  It's a technicality, but it's true.  The case has not been tried
 yet.)  >>
I could be wrong, but it was my understanding that the case will never have 
to go to trial because the judge already has ruled as a matter of law that 
Napster has and is violating copyrights, which is why the judge strongly 
encouraged Napster to try to reach a settlement because is Napster does not, 
Napster could not print enough money to pay the court's award, including 
penalties and coutr costs.

Paul I