Arguing over which brand of political criminal is the worse is
like arguing over 7Up or Mountain Dew.
They are more alike than they are different, and if they can fool
us into fighting over their minor differences, they have achieved
their goal: to insure that the millionares continue to run everything, and
the people pay for everything. I can't say it any clearer than that.
As far as the tax rebate: Bush's team was sitting, shooting the
bull one day, and somebody said, "It's too bad we can't just
BUY people's votes, legally, and with their own money".
RR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All I can say about this whine over government spending and "wasted" taxpayer
> funds a question: Where have you been for the last eight years while 15000
> trips were made on taxpayer money for DNC and Hillary fundraising. The
> Lewinsky lie coverup alone cost 10 million. Not to investigate it; to cover
> it up and deny it and defend it all the way to the futile Supreme Court
> efforts (2) to claim executive priviledge which every lawyer in the world
> said would fail. Still went ahead. How about $500,000 per year for secret
> service porotection for Chelsea SINCE Clinton has been out of office. He put
> that one in by executive order one hour before he left office and it was
> unprecedented. Nixon was villified for putting a $30,000 fence around his San
> Clemente house WHILE he was in office. I think I could probably send a zip
> file of a billion megs of this stuff. So carp on kids. Welcome back. Glad to
> know youve all regained consciousness and recovered from your comas. LOL.
