Greetings, I have been working with Jool at the University of Hawaii, and I have had good results setting up NAT64 networks with it. So far, when I do an additional 464xlat piece, I get some issues with SSL and packet size (I assume), but I'm hoping to clean that up.
When I look at the developmental open source NAT64 solutions, it seems like Jool is the most "serious" design, especially in terms of scalability. As co-chair of the Internet2 IPv6 Working Group, I am facilitating the development of some IPv6 tutorials for the Internet2 Technology Exchange in San Francisco next month, to include how to set up IPv6-only networks, with NAT64/DNS64/464XLAT to access legacy v4 Internet. I am planning to promote Jool as a toolkit to do NAT64 on a campus scale, and also talk about Cisco IOS, etc. I have also talked Internet2 into planning a v6-only SSID for the conference. Since their road kit can set up VMs easily, I was planning to do this with Jool and Linux based NAT64/464XLAT. My first question to this group -- am I doing something crazy? I had planned to do.my own load tests, and then the recent T-Rex thread came up. It looks like the levels of load that you have been talking about are higher than what I'm likely to encounter with a few hundred laptops and smart phones at a conference. Also, if there are Jool/SIIT experts here who would be willing to look over our plans and make suggestions, that would be good too. Regards, Alan Whinery Chief Internet Engineer University of Hawaii System Co-chair Internet2 IPv6 Working Group
_______________________________________________ Jool-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list
