Sorry APNIC44, not APAN44. APAN44 was in China last week...

On 9/6/2017 9:39 AM, Alan Whinery wrote:
> Thanks Jordi -- good to hear I'm not-yet-confirmed-crazy.
>
> I have seen that ripe74 slide set, looking forward to seeing the one
> after APAN44.
>
> Travel well, and safe. I will share a directory with some deployment
> notes in it with you, for when you get home.
>
>
> Alan
>
> On 9/6/2017 8:00 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> Nothing crazy at all.
>>
>> I’m doing it since some time ago.
>>
>> We have a plan for the next LACNIC meeting to do so in fact …
>>
>> I’ve used both Jool (for the NAT64 and the CLAT) in Ubuntu VMs. I’ve also 
>> used as CLAT a VM with OpenWRT.
>>
>> Also doing some testing with ISPs with customers in residential networks.
>>
>> https://ripe74.ripe.net/presentations/151-ripe-74-ipv6-464xlat-residential-v2.pdf
>>
>> I’ve done many presentations on this, some in Spanish, you can google for 
>> them. After tomorrow doing also workshops using Jool (NAT64, CLAT) in the 
>> APNIC44 in Taiwan. You will be able to download the slides in a couple of 
>> days, will work in a last review during the flight.
>>
>> I may be able to help if you have some questions. Note that my responses can 
>> be slightly delayed the next few days, as I’m heavily busy during the APNIC.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>>  
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: <[email protected]> en nombre de Alan Whinery <[email protected]>
>> Responder a: <[email protected]>
>> Fecha: miércoles, 6 de septiembre de 2017, 19:24
>> Para: <[email protected]>
>> Asunto: [Jool-list] Jool at the Internet2 Tech Exchange
>>
>>     Greetings,
>>     I have been working with Jool at the University of Hawaii, and I have 
>> had good results setting up NAT64 networks with it. So far, when I do an 
>> additional 464xlat piece, I get some issues with SSL and packet size (I 
>> assume), but I'm hoping to clean that up. 
>>     
>>     When I look at the developmental open source NAT64 solutions, it seems 
>> like Jool is the most "serious" design, especially in terms of scalability. 
>>     
>>     As co-chair of the Internet2 IPv6 Working Group, I am facilitating the 
>> development of some IPv6 tutorials for the Internet2 Technology Exchange in 
>> San Francisco next month, to include how to set up IPv6-only networks, with 
>> NAT64/DNS64/464XLAT to access legacy v4 Internet. I am planning to promote 
>> Jool as a toolkit to do NAT64 on a campus scale, and also talk about Cisco 
>> IOS, etc. 
>>     
>>     I have also talked Internet2 into planning a v6-only SSID for the 
>> conference. Since their road kit can set up VMs easily, I was planning to do 
>> this with Jool and Linux based NAT64/464XLAT. 
>>     
>>     My first question to this group -- am I doing something crazy? I had 
>> planned to do.my own load tests, and then the recent T-Rex thread came up. 
>> It looks like the levels of load that you have been talking about are higher 
>> than what I'm likely to encounter with a few hundred laptops and smart 
>> phones at a conference.
>>     
>>     Also, if there are Jool/SIIT experts here who would be willing to look 
>> over our plans and make suggestions, that would be good too. 
>>     
>>     Regards,
>>     Alan Whinery
>>     Chief Internet Engineer
>>     University of Hawaii System
>>     Co-chair Internet2 IPv6 Working Group
>>     
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Jool-list mailing list
>>     [email protected]
>>     https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list
>>     
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.consulintel.es
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
>> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
>> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
>> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be 
>> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of 
>> this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
>> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
>> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jool-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list

_______________________________________________
Jool-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail-lists.nic.mx/listas/listinfo/jool-list

Reply via email to