Scott;
You're on RHEL 4 because that's what's being run now; is there a patch
process so that the servers are updated? I believe PHP has gotten some
patches in the past year or so.
RHEL 4 is out of full support mode and into the "we provide patches when
there's something really security critical" mode. Recommend you
upgrade to RHEL 5 which has PHP 5, as soon as practical. However, keep
in mind you're going from PHP 4.3.9 on RHEL 4 to PHP 5 on RHEL 5. Might
be some testing needed.
If you need to be on RHEL then use CentOS. The security "gotchas"
mentioned are inherent in RHEL. Check your existing servers
/etc/selinux/conf file to see if SELinux is enabled, or what. You also
want to look at IP tables, most likely. Both can be turned off easily,
though having them on might be good for a public facing server.
If you want to get ready for RHEL 6, due out in Q1 or so, wait a few
days and get Fedora 12.
Feel free to ask any RH questions you want, makes me feel useful. :)
Leam
-- RHCE at large
Scott Wolpow wrote:
Ideally I need the RHEL 4 environment as my current servers are running
them for now.
I am planing working on optimizing the platform and customizing for my
needs.
Later I will move to a platform of my choice.
Scott Wolpow
On 11/15/2009 12:03 AM, Gary Mort wrote:
Dunno about your specific need, but here is my opinion on linux
flavors for servers:
CENTOS - has some nasty little gotcha's due to their default
configuration and emphasis on security. Install packages for std web
dev packages are years out of date requiring you to use non-secure
repositories or compile on your own to have up to date good. Not good
for the small company. Can provide professional level support needed
by mid to large companies.
Ubuntu - good overall mix of packages, slightly offputting user
command line tools, but overall quite good. As long as you have a
decent linux community to bounce questions off of, my choise of OS for
server.
Fedora - not the greatest server, but many of the benefits of CENTOS
without the years out of date part. Good for those coming from a
windows background to pickup and use. Requires a somewhat beefier
server than Ubuntu unless you really know what your doing when you
choose what parts to install. I just take everything and let it eat
hard drive space.
That's it. I used to have a slight preference for Debian over Ubuntu,
but there are more how to's for what I want to do for Ubuntu so that
gave it the edge.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Scott Wolpow <sc...@wolpow.com
<mailto:sc...@wolpow.com>> wrote:
I have to run a local server with RHEL 4
1) Should I just get RHEL 5 and ignore the differences?
2) Use CENTOS [I want to master the RHEL directory structure, so
this may be an issue]
3) Where can I get a safe copy of RHEL 4
4) Should I just use Fedora [Which may not be that stable]
Thanks
-- *Scott Wolpow*
*718.275.7765*
_______________________________________________
New York PHP SIG: Joomla! Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/joomla
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
New York PHP SIG: Joomla! Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/joomla
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.65/2503 - Release Date:
11/14/09 19:42:00
_______________________________________________
New York PHP SIG: Joomla! Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/joomla
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
