>
> >>But if possible, you should avoid casting, and use the generic type
> >> provided by jOOQ's API.
> > Meaning Result<Record>? As I see now it's also convenient, BTW.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean...?
>
Oh ;) I was just trying to understand your advice. "Generic type" you 
mentioned is Result<Record> or generic meant "simple"?

Reply via email to