>> >>But if possible, you should avoid casting, and use the generic type >> >> provided by jOOQ's API. >> > Meaning Result<Record>? As I see now it's also convenient, BTW. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean...? > > Oh ;) I was just trying to understand your advice. "Generic type" you > mentioned is Result<Record> or generic meant "simple"?
I meant the generic <R> type as in "Java generics". <R> either binds to Record or to "? extends TableRecord", depending on the API method you use
