This ticket is now implemented: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1816
Materialized view support in jooq-codegen is included for jOOQ 2.6.0 and will be available in the next snapshots. Cheers Lukas 2012/9/12 John Childress <[email protected]>: > Thank you very much. > > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:16:16 PM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> It might as well be that they're not contained in that dictionary >> view. At least in 11g, there's an ALL_MVIEW_COMMENTS table, which >> seems to contain these data: >> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28320/statviews_1132.htm >> >> I've added feature request #1816 to formally support materialized >> views in jOOQ's code generator >> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1816 >> >> In the mean time, you could try to patch >> org.jooq.util.oracle.OracleDatabase's getTables0() method... >> >> Cheers >> Lukas >> >> 2012/9/12 John Childress <[email protected]>: >> > Nope, not there... Let me see if there is something I need to do to get >> > them in there... >> > >> > >> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:51:20 PM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> >> >> >> I tried, but no luck... no errors, but nothing generated. I have >> >> >> one >> >> >> table >> >> >> and one materialized view, the table is the only object that gets >> >> >> generated. >> >> > >> >> > I'll double-check this on my side... >> >> >> >> N.B: I'm sorry, the tables are actually fetched from >> >> SYS.ALL_TAB_COMMENTS, only table columns are then fetched from >> >> SYS.ALL_TAB_COLS. Is your materialised view contained in the comments >> >> dictionary table?
