Hello, The [Schema-Name]Factory was one of the less good ideas in the history of jOOQ. It had been confusing a lot of people. The [SQLDialect]Factory was also disputed in the past. The two artefacts might be removed in 3.0.
Thanks for the hint with the tutorial. I will remove the GuestbookFactory reference from it. This will be tracked as #1866 https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/1866 Ideally, you will just use a regular org.jooq.impl.Factory with appropriate Configuration and Settings Cheers Lukas 2012/10/10 Eric Schwarzenbach <[email protected]>: > I ran into this issue too, using PostgreSQL. I think this gives me my > solution, to use the PostgresFactory instead of a [Schema-Name]Factory > class. > > I think I'm still not grasping the idea behind the [Schema-Name]Factory > classes. (Where is that documented, btw?) I was using them because the > tutorial code I started from seems to use them, and it intuitively made > sense to use the one for the schema I was using. But in any case, shouldn't > it have worked? > > Regards, > > Eric
