Hi,
It seems this would be useful. Maybe I'm using the library in an odd way,
but I've got insert code that looks a lot like update code -- all the
set(...) calls are the same. I might put those set(...) calls into a
common function, but you can't because UpdateSetStep is not related to
InsertSetStep. I've written a wrapper interface that allows be to do it,
but it's not as convenient as it could be. Have you thought of making them
share a common interface, if that makes sense?
Rob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
