On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:05:07 AM UTC-3, Lukas Eder wrote: > > > As a workaround, you can instanciate the internal (but public) type > org.jooq.impl.SequenceImpl instead. >
I had already attempted this, but doesn't the constructor require all sort of higher order classes like schemas and such, forcing me to construct classes for additional entities in the database? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
