Hi Garret, 2014-04-16 15:49 GMT+02:00 Garret Wilson <[email protected]>:
> On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:05:07 AM UTC-3, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> >> As a workaround, you can instanciate the internal (but public) type >> org.jooq.impl.SequenceImpl instead. >> > > I had already attempted this, but doesn't the constructor require all sort > of higher order classes like schemas and such, forcing me to construct > classes for additional entities in the database? > An example implementation of such a workaround can be seen here, in the commit of our recent implementation of DSL.sequenceByName(): https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/commit/c915b67eda1afd933d8e30901dca18b96d7e549a#diff-71e1fb4ed47f60931aed360e82f98823R5082 Hope this helps Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
