Alf, On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:59 AM Alf Lervåg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for this writeup Lukas, good to have these texts to refer to. > Hopefully this will be a blog post as well? > Could be an interesting idea, thanks. The post would focus on the graph (identity) vs. tree (value) discussion. > I just want to say that we’re having great success in autogenerating > API-implementations based on API specifications combined with some > annotations that tie the APIs to our autogenerated jOOQ-library. > That also sounds like a blog post! Or even an open source library? I kinda sense that you did things like what has been discussed here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/13069 I'm still very keen on facilitating the most common use-cases, without getting lured into any too opinionated framework. I.e. most tree structures are probably quite similar, and hand-rolling the exact query to materialise a specific tree structure is too boring, so it's quite possible that generating the query from the tree structure is an interesting approach. Maybe, you re-invented GraphQL to some extent? :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/CAB4ELO6_g-AqrsTAW1ZmEzP3wATX_f_1kYtFZxEhAWiO8podoQ%40mail.gmail.com.
