Rivalry...... Is there really a need to try and out shine each other? 

Sent from my iPad

On 20 Oct 2012, at 14:20, [email protected] wrote:

> Hmmm! We really can't afford any form of rivalry amongst our chapters.
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
> From: Sagai John Adam <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
> To: cssjos<[email protected]>
> ReplyTo: [email protected]
> Subject: [Jos Commandos] Letter #7 - THE NEED FOR CHAPTER COOPERATION
> 
>  
> -----------
> P.M.B. 2250
> -----------
> A Series of 20 Letters espousing Ideas, Strategies and (atimes Bitter) Home 
> Truths to Alumni of Command Secondary School Jos.
>  
> From Adam John (1986 Set, Tiger House)
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Letter    7 of 20, October 19, 2012
>  
>  
> Dear Commando,
>  
>  
> THE NEED FOR CHAPTER COOPERATION
>  
>  
> Ah! The COJOSAA Chapter. Our home. The basic unit of the COJOSAA 
> Organizational structure.
>  
> We have 6 Chapters locally and 2 International Chapters (which are 
> technically not Chapters.)
>  
> In my previous letter (Letter #6: The Need For Cyber Chapters And Cyber 
> Meetings) I suggested 2 more local Chapters and 3 International Chapters to 
> cover all Jos Commandos everywhere. However, these won’t be the regular, 
> traditional Chapters, but will reside on the internet.
>  
> As more Chapters come on stream, there will be a greater need for more 
> collaboration, more co operation and more cross-pollination between the 
> Chapters of the COJOSA Family.
>  
> So far, not enough of these are happening.
>  
>  
> CHAPTER RIVALRY
>  
>  
> Our Chapters are more of rivals than partners.
>  
> During the burial of Papa Uwakwe, COJOSA North America insisted on giving 
> their financial contributions separate from all the other Chapters. So 
> instead of one contribution from ALL of Papa Uwakwe’s children, we had two 
> different announcements.
>  
>  
> Read the rest here:
> http://cssjos.com/profiles/blogs/letter-7-of-20-the-need-for-chapter-cooperation
> 
> 

Reply via email to