Thanks for the revisions, but the absolute numbers really don't matter. The important feature is that nobody voted Yes on 1 and No on 2.
On Friday, February 8, 2013, Mike Jones wrote: > FWIW, I believe that John Bradley’s, Ryo Ito’s, and Dick Hardt’s > responses are also incorrectly tallied below, the caveats on Breno de > Medeiros’ “B” are missing, and Chuck Mortimore’s response is missing. I > believe that their responses were:**** > > ** ** > > N Y A Campbell **** > > N Y A Bradley **** > > N Y A Ito **** > > Y Y C Hardt (Dick changed his answer on 3)**** > > Y Y B* de Medeiros (*B if the new header can be > omitted, so that 3-component JWTs are still valid. I don't support this > option if backwards-incompatible.)**** > > Y Y A Mortimore **** > > ** ** > > By my count, this would bring the answers to date on the first question to: > **** > > ** ** > > 16 “yes”**** > > 10 “no”**** > > ** ** > > FWIW**** > > ** ** > > And yes, the IETF doesn’t vote… J I’m sure we’ll have an interesting > discussion after the polling period is over on Monday. As for me, I have > been actively thinking about how to meet everyone’s perceived needs, but > will hold off on that until after Monday.**** > > ** ** > > Take care, > **** > > -- Mike*** > * > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>] > *On Behalf Of *Brian Campbell > *Sent:* Friday, February 08, 2013 3:35 PM > *To:* Richard Barnes > *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [jose] Header criticality -- hidden consensus?**** > > ** ** > > FWIW, I didn't see my name on the tabulation but I did 'vote' > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg01461.html**** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', '[email protected]');>> > wrote:**** > > We're 24 votes into the header criticality poll, so I thought I would go > ahead and take a look at how the results are shaping up. My initial > tabulation is below. The result on the FIRST POLL (the main one) is as > follows:**** > > ** ** > > No: 10**** > > Yes: 14**** > > ** ** > > What I find striking, however, is that every single person that voted > "Yes" on the FIRST POLL also voted "Yes" on the SECOND POLL. So nobody who > thinks that all headers should be critical thinks that a JOSE library > should actually be required to enforce this constraint. And that means > that enforcing that all headers are supported cannot be a MUST according to > RFC 2119.**** > > ** ** > > So I wonder if there's consensus to remove the following text from JWE and > JWS:**** > > -----BEGIN-JWE-----**** > > 4. The resulting JWE Header MUST be validated to only include**** > > parameters and values whose syntax and semantics are both**** > > understood and supported.**** > > -----END-JWE-----**** > > -----BEGIN-JWS-----**** > > 4. The resulting JWS Header MUST be validated to only include**** > > parameters and values whose syntax and semantics are both**** > > understood and supported.**** > > -----END-JWS-----**** > > ** ** > > Otherewise, a JOSE library conforming to these specifications would be > REQUIRED (a synonym to MUST in 2119) to reject a JWE/JWS that contains an > unknown header, contradicting all those "Yes" votes on the SECOND POLL.*** > * > > ** ** > > --Richard**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -----BEGIN-Tabulation-----**** > > 1 2 3 Name: **** > > N - - Bradley **** > > N - - Ito **** > > N N A Yee **** > > N N B Barnes **** > > N N B Rescorla **** > > N N C Manger **** > > N N C Octman **** > > N Y A Fletcher **** > > N Y A Miller **** > > N Y A Sakimura **** > > Y Y - D'Agostino **** > > Y Y A Biering **** > > Y Y A Brault **** > > Y Y A Hedberg **** > > Y Y A Jay **** > > Y Y A Jones **** > > Y Y A Marais **** > > Y Y A Nadalin **** > > Y Y A Nara **** > > Y Y A Nennker **** > > Y Y A Solberg **** > > Y Y B Hardt **** > > Y Y B Medeiros **** > > Y Y C Matake **** > > Y Y C Mishra **** > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose**** > > ** ** >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
