Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8> proposes adding an
"spi" (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and JWE
specifications. This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for
signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used,
rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header. This
proposal has been written up as
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.
Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
1. Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that
could optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.
2. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE
specifications as a mandatory feature.
3. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE
specifications as an optional feature.
4. Another resolution (please specify in detail).
0. I need more information to decide.
Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19^th or earlier.
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
