1
2013/4/12 Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> > ****Issue #8 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/8 proposes > adding an “spi” (security parameters index) header parameter to the JWS and > JWE specifications. This modification to the JOSE formats would allow for > signaling that pre-negotiated cryptographic parameters are being used, > rather than including those parameters in the JWS or JWE header. This > proposal has been written up as > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-spi-00.**** > > ** ** > > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?**** > > 1. Have draft-barnes-jose-spi remain a separate specification that could > optionally also be supported by JWS and JWE implementations.**** > > 2. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications > as a mandatory feature.**** > > 3. Incorporate draft-barnes-jose-spi into the JWS and JWE specifications > as an optional feature.**** > > 4. Another resolution (please specify in detail).**** > > 0. I need more information to decide.**** > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
