1

nov

On Apr 16, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1.  Continue having separate Ciphertext, Initialization Vector, and Integrity 
> Value values in the JWE representation.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Roland Hedberg
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use 
> RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
> 
> 1
> 
> 12 apr 2013 kl. 01:58 skrev Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>:
> 
> Issue #11 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/11 proposes 
> restructuring the JWE representation to remove the JWE Integrity Value field 
> and instead use the RFC 5116 (AEAD) binary serialization to represent the 
> Ciphertext, Initialization Vector, and Integrity Value values.  If this 
> proposal is adopted, JWEs would then have three fields - the header, the 
> encrypted key, and the RFC 5116 combination of the Ciphertext, Initialization 
> Vector, and Integrity Value values. 
> This issue is also related to issue #3.  Note that the updated McGrew draft 
> described there could be used whether or not we switched to using RFC 5116.
> 
> 
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> 
> 1.  Continue having separate Ciphertext, Initialization Vector, and Integrity 
> Value values in the JWE representation.
> 
> 2.  Switch to using the RFC 5116 (AEAD) serialization to represent the 
> combination of these three values.
> 
> 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).
> 
> 0.  I need more information to decide.
> 
> 
> 
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier. 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to