1
I like the simplicity of just strings. I like to see a library source code,
and easily find what is supported or not. This is easy to read: "switch
(alg) case "HS256": ..."


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:05 PM, nov matake <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1
>
> nov
>
> On Apr 14, 2013, at 4:17 AM, Roland Hedberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > 1
> >
> > 12 apr 2013 kl. 01:58 skrev Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Issue #7 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/7 points out
> that the JWA algorithm identifiers are different than those used by the W3C
> WebCrypto draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/.  The JWA algorithm
> identifiers are strings, whereas the W3C WebCrypto algorithm identifiers
> are structures including string identifiers.  The working group had
> previously decided to continue representing JOSE algorithms as strings, as
> recorded at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg01219.html.
> >>
> >> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?
> >>
> >> 1.  Continue have the JWA algorithm identifiers be strings, and not
> objects.  Note that WebCrypto may choose to use some of these same strings,
> where applicable.
> >>
> >> 2.  Switch to using the algorithm identifier structures defined in the
> WebCrypto draft.
> >>
> >> 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).
> >>
> >> 0.  I need more information to decide.
> >>
> >> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jose mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jose mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to