1

On 04/16/2013 11:51 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
If we're just talking about how the algorithm in use is determined, then I 
would prefer (1).

While I see value in better separating key encipherment parameters from content 
encipherment parameters, that seems like a separate question.


- m&m

Matt Miller < [email protected] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.


On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

2b. Switch to a structure more like the WebCrypto structure, in which
algorithm parameters are collected alongside the algorithm name -- and
separately from key encipherment parameters.

Cf. [draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping]



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>wrote:

Issue #7 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/7 points out
that the JWA algorithm identifiers are different than those used by the W3C
WebCrypto draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/.  The JWA algorithm
identifiers are strings, whereas the W3C WebCrypto algorithm identifiers
are structures including string identifiers.  The working group had
previously decided to continue representing JOSE algorithms as strings, as
recorded at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg01219.html.
****


Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?****

1.  Continue have the JWA algorithm identifiers be strings, and not
objects.  Note that WebCrypto may choose to use some of these same strings,
where applicable.****

2.  Switch to using the algorithm identifier structures defined in the
WebCrypto draft.****

3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).****

0.  I need more information to decide.****

Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.




_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose


_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- m&m

Matt Miller < [email protected] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.



_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to