1. Yes – Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS and JWE headers ARE important.
I also think the KID or other method of identifying the key is a SHOULD. It might be that there is only one key so identifying it is a touch redundant. We have methods other than kid to identify the key as well. On 2013-04-11, at 8:59 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests > requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all JWS > and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means > other than the JWS or JWE headers important? > Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue? > > 1. Yes. > > 2. No. > > 0. I need more information to decide. > > > > Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th (or earlier). > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
