Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

[email protected] Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:39:02 -0700

1.Yes, Use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than JWS and JWE headers are important.

Charles Marais.

Le 12/04/2013 01:59, Karen O'Donoghue a écrit :

Issue #15 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/15. suggests requiring that a key indicator, such as a “kid” field, be required in all JWS and JWE headers. Are use cases where key information is exchanged by means other than the JWS or JWE headers important?
Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?

1. Yes.

2. No.

0. I need more information to decide.

Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19^th (or earlier).
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

MARAIS Charles
FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/IDEA/UED
Tel : 02.96.05.24.18
[email protected]
WF004Bis / R&D Lannion / 2, avenue Pierre Marzin / 22307 LANNION Cedex - France

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory

Reply via email to