On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
> <chair> > > At this point only the fact that binary encodings exist is in scope for the > WG. > > Any concreteness would require a charter modification. > Any concrete would needs be added in apps area in any case. The reason for raising it here was simply to make people aware that there is a binary option and to encourage anyone who might be interested in making sure that it is suitable for use with JOSE to take a look to check if anything was left out. I would like to be able to use JOSE as an alternative to CMS at some point. But not with the Base64 penalty. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
