Conversely, there's some discussion right now about how to make JOSE suitable for a binary-capable encoding: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg02493.html>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]>wrote: > >> <chair> >> >> At this point only the fact that binary encodings exist is in scope for >> the >> WG. >> >> Any concreteness would require a charter modification. >> > > Any concrete would needs be added in apps area in any case. > > The reason for raising it here was simply to make people aware that there > is a binary option and to encourage anyone who might be interested in > making sure that it is suitable for use with JOSE to take a look to check > if anything was left out. > > I would like to be able to use JOSE as an alternative to CMS at some > point. But not with the Base64 penalty. > > -- > Website: http://hallambaker.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
