> Honestly, I don't really care format what the software takes.  It's pretty
> trivial to convert between the compressed format and (x,y).

I'm not sure which way you're arguing here.

I also like to just use the 32-byte public key instead of or as the
kid (just transmitting the public key with each signature).

> On the other hand, I could see defining something different for the private
> key, since it's not directly a point multiplier.

Would be cool to see Ed25519 in this spec. It has been a useful
specification so far. That is all.
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to