+1 On Feb 5, 2014 4:06 PM, "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe that we should make this change, since it aligns with the > WebCrypto editor's draft at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html. I > believe that the names "wrap" and "unwrap" came from the older draft at > http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/. > > > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* jose [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark Watson > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [jose] Naming of JWK key_ops values for wrap and unwrap > > > > All, > > > > Since JWK key_ops was added primarily to accurately represent WebCrypto > keys, would it be possible to amend the values for "wrap" and "unwrap" to > "wrapKey" and "unwrapKey" to align with the WebCrypto naming ? > > > > ...Mark > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
