+1
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 > On Feb 5, 2014 4:06 PM, "Mike Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I believe that we should make this change, since it aligns with the >> WebCrypto editor's draft at >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html. I >> believe that the names "wrap" and "unwrap" came from the older draft at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/. >> >> >> >> -- Mike >> >> >> >> *From:* jose [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark Watson >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:01 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [jose] Naming of JWK key_ops values for wrap and unwrap >> >> >> >> All, >> >> >> >> Since JWK key_ops was added primarily to accurately represent WebCrypto >> keys, would it be possible to amend the values for "wrap" and "unwrap" to >> "wrapKey" and "unwrapKey" to align with the WebCrypto naming ? >> >> >> >> ...Mark >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> >> > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
