I don't think that's meaningful but I am already happy if there is a section in the JWA document that explains that these interoperability requirements refer to standalone libraries.
I also think that the table for the IANA consideration section needs to make that clear as well.
Ciao
Hannes
Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2014 um 14:09 Uhr
Von: "John Bradley" <[email protected]>
An: "Hannes Tschofenig" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [jose] Implementation Requirements
Von: "John Bradley" <[email protected]>
An: "Hannes Tschofenig" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [jose] Implementation Requirements
The IESG wants to see interoperability between implementations, to do that without dragging in discovery etc there need to be minimum feature sets of JOSE libraries that people can count on.
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
A application using JOSE can elect not to support all the algorithms, but JOSE libraries need to support the mandatory to implement algorithms.
On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi all,I am looking at the implementation requirements of the JWA spec and I am wondering to what deployment environment they refer they.The JW* specs are generic building blocks and I fail to see how one can list mandatory-to-implement algorithsms.CiaoHannes
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
