From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 8:34 AM
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: Pete Resnick; Ted Lemon; John Bradley; [email protected]; The 
IESG; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Pete Resnick's Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33: 
(with DISCUSS and COMMENT)



On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Richard Barnes 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Pete Resnick 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 10/2/14 10:18 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Oct 2, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Pete 
Resnick<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:

If I use a instant messaging protocol that uses JWS as a payload format for 
signed instant messages, and in my client, when I receive a message with a 
broken signature, I display the message to the user but put a big red box 
around the message with a flashing title in the margin in 7 point Helvetica  
that says, "Invalid Signature", will I have violated the JWS spec? This isn't 
as part of "error processing and display"; I'm displaying the text of the 
message to the user, but I'm marking it as invalid.

That seems like the wrong thing to do, unless you like to get a lot of nicely 
highlighted spam in your instant messaging client.

Very much depends on the environment and the purpose. Which is an 
implementation decision. "MUST reject" is, in fact, not right.

Look, the signature verification process has two outcomes:
1. This is a valid signed object
2. This is not a valid signed object
The common names for these are "accept" and "reject".  No further semantics 
apply.

I agree with Richard here.  If we go down the path of changing the language, 
then we'll have to explore qualifiers to make sure we are not introducing 
security risks as well.

+1 from me.  We can explore adding language saying that “reject” does not imply 
that error processing can’t occur, but I don’t see a compelling case for 
changing the accept/reject language throughout.

                                                            -- Mike

--Richard




pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478<tel:%2B1%20%28858%29651-4478>




--

Best regards,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to