On 2015-11-26 19:42, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 11/26/15 7:58 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Disclaimer: I have not been involved in this in any way...
https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/SCAI
FWIW this was in the Payments Interest Group and not the
Payments Working Group, and it's not clear to me that
they're actually going to do anything with this. I would
double-check with them about what's going on with that.
You are absolutely correct, this is one of huge bunch of proposals:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments-ig/2015Nov/0074.html
I agree with you about the proposal being unattractive.
The intention with my message was rather highlighting the mismatch between JOSE
and schemes like the one proposed which (IMO) motivates a renewed JOSE activity
along the lines I have previously described.
After the recent revelations about ES6 and its implementation in some very
popular
platforms this seems to be even more useful than I originally thought. None of
that information and use-cases were at hand when JOSE started.
Anders
Melinda
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
