On 2016-03-04 18:36, Mike Jones wrote:
The PKCE RFC [RFC 7636] also uses "S256".
Since this points to a rather specific application, I'm not sure if this speaks for or against using S256 for indicating SHA256... Anders
-----Original Message----- From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Rundgren Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 7:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE Hash-algorithm Identifiers? No takers on this one? On 2015-12-09 08:12, Anders Rundgren wrote:The following extract from a recent ACME posting indicates that I'm not the only one who see use-cases for such: It's not a bad idea to specify the agreement-integrity as a dictionary instead so in that future case, there's not problem of checksum negotiation: "agreement-integrity": {"sha512": "3Ys8QL9di54ggXIGBAS2RHr_W6cMurZPizhZihkQjwl3VG2dpXZYmsYZ0B7LG-tWlVE9- Hwp9hL3Mosvbr6lCA"} In my work I used the names S128, S256, and S512. Anders_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
