For ________________________________ From: Anders Rundgren<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 3/4/2016 10:46 AM To: Mike Jones<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE Hash-algorithm Identifiers?
On 2016-03-04 18:36, Mike Jones wrote: > The PKCE RFC [RFC 7636] also uses "S256". Since this points to a rather specific application, I'm not sure if this speaks for or against using S256 for indicating SHA256... Anders > > -----Original Message----- > From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Rundgren > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 7:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE Hash-algorithm Identifiers? > > No takers on this one? > > On 2015-12-09 08:12, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> The following extract from a recent ACME posting indicates that I'm not the >> only one who see use-cases for such: >> >> It's not a bad idea to specify the agreement-integrity as a dictionary >> instead so in that future case, there's not problem of checksum >> negotiation: >> "agreement-integrity": {"sha512": >> "3Ys8QL9di54ggXIGBAS2RHr_W6cMurZPizhZihkQjwl3VG2dpXZYmsYZ0B7LG-tWlVE9- >> Hwp9hL3Mosvbr6lCA"} >> >> In my work I used the names S128, S256, and S512. >> >> Anders >> > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
